Monitor and defend your brand's AI narrative

You get notifications and a weekly email digest on every plan, covering sentiment shifts, visibility drops and new citations. Tracking runs on a daily cycle, so the honest description is daily rather than real time, and we would rather say that than imply a live feed. The cadence suits the actual risk, because an AI narrative forms through repetition across sources: what matters is catching a shift that persists, not the first minute it appears.

Yes. Every scored mention links to the full answer the engine returned and the passage that produced the score, and citation tracking shows the off-site source behind it, whether that is a review page, a thread, a video or an article. That chain is what turns a red number into a plan, because the response to an engine repeating a critical review is nothing like the response to a stale fact on your own site.

By whether engines cite it. Plenty of critical coverage is never used in an answer, while one modest thread that keeps being cited can do more damage than a hostile article that is not. The citation leaderboard ranks sources by how often engines reach for them in your category, so you can put effort where it changes what a buyer is told rather than responding to everything that exists.

No, and nobody honestly can: there is no edit button on a model's output. What you can do is correct the source. Start with your own pages and structured data, since those are yours, then the third-party sources the engine cites. Entity accuracy checks tell you which claims are wrong and where they came from, and daily tracking tells you when the correction has been absorbed, which typically takes days to weeks.

Per-answer sentiment, with the passage that produced each score, is included on every plan. The reputation dashboard that turns those into a net score, a trend over time and a set of positive and negative excerpts is on every plan too. Sentiment is tracked per engine, so a narrative present on one engine and not the others usually points at a single cited source rather than a category-wide problem.

Media monitoring covers what has been published; this covers what an assistant tells someone who asks. The two overlap only partly, because engines use a narrow slice of published coverage and weight it by how citable it looks. Running both, you get earned coverage from one and the effect on what buyers are actually told from the other, and the citation view tells you which of your coverage made it through.