Own the YouTube, Reddit and listicles AI pulls from

YouTube and Reddit intelligence, plus presence in the 'best of' roundups and listicles engines lean on when recommending options. Reddit and general mentions monitoring is included on every plan. YouTube owned-media tracking, which shows the videos cited about you and how they portray you, is a Professional and Enterprise feature, as is mobile-app visibility. All of it is driven by what engines actually cited for your prompts rather than by a separate social crawl.

Because an answer engine has to choose a small number of sources, and it prefers ones that read as independent. A category roundup, a well-upvoted thread or a review video often carries more weight in a recommendation than your own product page, which an engine treats as a claim rather than as evidence. So the off-site set is frequently where the recommendation is won or lost, and it is the part most teams are not watching.

Yes. Cited off-site sources are scored for sentiment the same way as direct AI answers, with the passage kept alongside the score. That distinction matters on these platforms, where being mentioned is not automatically good news: a widely cited thread describing your onboarding as painful is doing more damage than being absent would. Seeing the specific passage is what lets you decide whether to respond, correct or leave it alone.

The 'best X' and roundup-style pages engines cite when recommending options in your category, whether they sit on a review site, a publication or a competitor's own blog. We track whether you appear, in what position, and how you are characterised, and flag the ones featuring competitors without you. Those pages are disproportionately influential because they are already formatted as a recommendation, which is exactly the shape an answer engine is looking for.

Not through us, and we would not claim otherwise: those platforms are not yours and their moderation rules are their own. What we can do is tell you which threads and videos are actually being cited, so effort goes where it changes an answer instead of into every mention. From there the realistic moves are participating honestly in the thread, fixing the underlying complaint, or getting a better source published and cited.

No, and the starting point is the difference. Brand monitoring works forwards from every mention on the internet, most of which no engine will ever read. This works backwards from the sources engines actually cited in answers about your category, so the list is short, weighted by influence, and connected directly to the prompts you are losing. Volume of mentions is not the metric here; being present in the cited few is.